COMMON MAPS
Map version new-york activity top-down
Main site Contact
Menu
↑ parent activity group ·
research dossier

THE EMPIRE STATE MEDICAL SCIENTIFIC & EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC

CAMILLUS, NY · EIN 131939109 · Form 990 · FY2025 · NTEE G00D · Voluntary Health Associations · Medium ($1M-$10M) · esmsef.com
revenue
$9.8M
expenses
$8.9M
net assets
$8.8M
employees
62
program ratio
87%
mission · from form 990

MEDICAL PEER REVIEW

profile · synthesized from sources

The Empire State Medical, Scientific and Educational Foundation Inc. is a nonprofit organization providing independent medical peer review services across New York State and nationally. It specializes in external dispute resolution, utilization review, and coding/DRG validation for healthcare providers and payors. With over 40 years of experience and URAC accreditation, the foundation ensures evidence-based, unbiased decisions using board-certified physician reviewers.

named programs · 4 · from sources

What they call their work

Coding and DRG Validation
Audits ICD-10 coding and DRG assignments for accuracy and compliance, involving certified coders and physician specialists to validate documentation and ensure proper reimbursement.
Cost Outlier/Billing Validation
Conducts line-by-line review of itemized charges to verify services billed were ordered and provided, including medical necessity of admission and length of stay.
Independent External Appeal/Dispute Resolution Review
Resolves payment disputes between providers and payors involving medical necessity and/or DRG assignment using board-certified, conflict-free physician reviewers who reference nationally recognized medical criteria and guidelines.
Utilization Review
Reviews medical records to assess medical necessity and quality of care across all levels of service, conducted by registered nurses and board-certified physicians using nationally recognized criteria.
activities · 3 groups

What they do

  • Health Information Exchange Support 2 activities
    • Maintains URAC accreditation for independent review services
      Operates as an accredited Independent Review Organization (IRO) under URAC standards, maintaining External Review accreditation since achieving Comprehensive IRO accreditation in 2013. This supports credibility and compliance in delivering external appeals and medical review services.
    • Operates external appeal and dispute resolution programs
      Manages an independent external appeals process to resolve payment disputes between providers and payors related to medical necessity and DRG assignment. Services are delivered in accordance with URAC standards and leverage over 40 years of clinical and coding expertise.
  • Healthcare System Administrative Support 1 activity
    • Conducts medical peer review and utilization review services
      Provides utilization review services to evaluate the medical necessity, appropriateness of care, and adherence to quality standards, serving healthcare providers and payors across all care settings. This includes prospective, concurrent, and retrospective reviews supported by clinical documentation analysis.
  • Uncategorized 1 activity
    • Provides coding and DRG validation services
      Offers coding and Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG) validation services using certified coders and board-certified physicians in active clinical practice. Reviews include validation of ICD-10-CM, ICD-10-PCS, and DRG assignments based on client-specified Grouper versions, ensuring accuracy in billing and reimbursement.
financials · form 990 · fy2025
revenue
Total revenue$9.75M
Contributions & grants$00%
Program service revenue$9.51M98%
Investment income$239K2%
Other revenue$3K
expenses
Total expenses$8.88M
Program expenses87%
Admin / overhead13%
Fundraising0%
Salaries & benefits$5.59M
Grants paid out$0
Largest expense lineCompensation
balance sheet
Total assets$11.49M
Cash$3.55M
Investments$4.00M
Liabilities$2.71M
Net assets$8.78M
Liquid reserves10.2 mo
6 years on record · 2020–2025 · YoY revenue -1.0%
leadership · form 990 part vii · fy2025

Who runs it

paid leadership · 14
NameTitleHours/wkCompensation
FRANCES SCOTT EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT 35 $274K
ROBERTA BOCKER CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER - 35 $242K
ANNA M GEORGIADIS SENIOR REGISTERED NURSE 35 $208K
TOM MCCANN DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION 35 $159K
CHRISTOPHER TOGIAS CONTROLLER 35 $140K
CORLISS VARNUM MD BOARD MEMBER 1 $2K
JOSEPH MALDONADO MD BOARD PRESIDENT 1 $2K
KIRA GERACI-CIARDULLO MD SECRETARY 1 $2K
LIANA LEUNG MD BOARD MEMBER 1 $2K
LOUIS AUGUSTE MD BOARD TREASURER 1 $2K
NATALIE ADLER MD BOARD MEMBER 1 $2K
PARAG MEHTA MD BOARD MEMBER 1 $2K
ROBERT HUGHES MD BOARD VICE PRESIDENT 1 $2K
RUBEN PINKHASOV MD BOARD MEMBER 1 $1K
relationships · 6

Who they work with

  • NAIRO Coalition — Active member organization contributing to industry standards for medical peer review and utilization review.
  • URAC Government — Accrediting body for ESMSEF as an Independent Review Organization since 2013.
  • URAC Government — Accrediting body for ESMSEF as an Independent Review Organization: External
  • URAC Government — Adheres to URAC standards in conducting external appeal and dispute resolution reviews.
  • payors Partner — Provides utilization review and cost outlier/billing validation services to healthcare payors
  • providers Partner — Provides utilization review and cost outlier/billing validation services to healthcare providers
strategies · 4

How they approach the work

Named approaches extracted from this org’s sources. Where others share an approach, follow it to see the full set of orgs running it.

  • Conflict-Free Review Protocol
    methodology: conflict_free_review
    By assigning reviewers without significant conflicts of interest, the organization ensures impartiality and trust in medical review decisions because perceived and actual bias is minimized, increasing stakeholder acceptance of outcomes.
  • Physician-Led, Evidence-Based Peer Review
    methodology: physician_led_peer_review
    By using actively practicing, board-certified physicians and evidence-based medical criteria to conduct peer reviews, the organization ensures clinical accuracy, objectivity, and real-world applicability in medical dispute resolution because clinical expertise and standardized guidelines improve the validity and trustworthiness of outcomes.
  • Specialty-Aligned Clinical Review
    methodology: specialty_aligned_review
    By assigning board-certified physicians with aligned medical specialties to conduct reviews, the organization produces more clinically accurate and relevant evaluations because reviewer expertise directly matches case complexity and medical context.
  • Standardized, Clinically-Informed Coding Review
    methodology: clinically_informed_coding_review
    By combining clinically active physicians and certified coders trained in national guidelines, the organization ensures technically and clinically accurate coding and DRG validation because dual expertise bridges clinical reality and billing precision.