What they call their work
What they do
-
Human Rights Advocacy & Accountability 2 activities
- Document and report on human rights abuses related to the October 7 attacks and hostage crisisProduces detailed reports and publicizes firsthand testimonies documenting sexual violence and other human rights abuses committed during the October 7 attacks and in captivity, including amplifying the voices of freed hostages before international bodies.
- Research and publish on UN human rights mechanisms and accountabilityConducts in-depth research on the UN human rights treaty system, Council/Commission actions, resolution patterns, and institutional performance; maintains datasets and rankings of states condemned for human rights violations from 2003–2017.
-
-
Human Rights Advocacy and Public Education 1 activity
- Expose and challenge human rights violations in Iran and other countriesDocuments and publicizes persecution of religious minorities in Iran, including the Baha’i community, and highlights Iran’s nuclear proliferation activities and concealment efforts based on IAEA findings.
-
-
General Operating Support Grants 1 activity
- Track and publish data on U.S. funding and expenditures within the United NationsReports on annual U.S. financial contributions to the United Nations across assessed, voluntary, and in-kind categories, and cites UN system-wide expenditure data to inform transparency and accountability discussions.
-
-
Uncategorized 3 activities
- Monitor and critique UN actions and bias concerning Israel and antisemitismDocuments and analyzes the United Nations' disproportionate focus on Israel, including structural mechanisms like permanent agenda items, special rapporteurs, and UNRWA’s unique mandate; critiques the Durban process and related conferences for fostering antisemitism under the guise of anti-racism.
- Oppose and analyze the UN Commission of Inquiry on Israel and PalestineDocuments advocacy efforts by anti-Israel NGOs in support of the Commission of Inquiry, publishes commentary opposing its leadership and findings, and compiles submissions related to its timeline and knowledge base.
- Report on global human rights issues and UN accountability gapsDocuments human rights consequences of discriminatory laws (e.g., Ghana’s anti-LGBTQ+ legislation), critiques UN inaction on terrorism definitions and enforcement, and highlights individuals or entities within the UN system alleged to promote antisemitism or have extremist ties.
-
Who runs it
| Name | Title | Hours/wk | Compensation |
|---|---|---|---|
| ANNE BAYEFSKY | PRESIDENT | 25 | $50K |
- ELLEN E CHURCHILL — DIRECTOR
- ROBERT IMMERMAN — DIRECTOR
Who they work with
- Human Rights Council Government — Monitors and reports on the Human Rights Council as a key UN human rights mechanism.
- International Criminal Court Government — Reports on and critiques actions of the ICC, particularly regarding investigations into Israeli leaders and misconduct by the prosecutor.
- Navi Pillay Partner — Former Chair of the Commission of Inquiry, subject of critical analysis by Human Rights Voices
- Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Partner — Collaborated on a review of the UN human rights treaty system and authoring of a major reform report in 2001
- Touro HRH Institute Partner — Collaborated with Touro HRH Institute on a video presentation regarding the UN Human Rights Council.
- U.S. Congress Partner — Supports legislative efforts by members of Congress to reassess U.S. funding to the United Nations.
- UNRWA Government — Critically monitors and reports on alleged ties between UNRWA staff and Hamas.
- United Nations Government — Critical engagement with the United Nations' role in the Durban conferences and related human rights processes.
- United Nations Government — Monitors and critiques structural bodies and mechanisms within the United Nations system related to Israel and Palestine.
- United Nations Government — Monitors and reports on U.S. funding and policy engagement with the United Nations.
- United Nations Government — Primary source of data on resolutions, decisions, and official actions related to human rights violations
- United Nations Human Rights Council Government — Monitors and challenges findings and procedures of the UN Human Rights Council, particularly regarding allegations against Israel.
How they approach the work
Named approaches extracted from this org’s sources. Where others share an approach, follow it to see the full set of orgs running it.
- Exposure of Systemic Bias in International Institutionsmethodology: expose_bias_in_international_institutionsBy systematically documenting and publicizing structural flaws, disproportionate scrutiny, and perceived antisemitism within UN human rights mechanisms, the organization seeks to delegitimize biased outcomes and drive institutional reform, because exposing systemic bias undermines the credibility of unfair processes and mobilizes public and legislative pressure.
- Institutional Accountability Through Transparency and Evidence-Based Advocacymethodology: transparency-and-accountabilityBy using rigorous research, formal institutional tracking, and public documentation of UN actions, the organization promotes accountability in human rights governance, because limiting claims to formally recorded actions increases credibility and strengthens the argument for reform based on observable institutional behavior rather than advocacy narratives.
- Media and Public Advocacy to Shift Perception and Policymethodology: media_advocacyBy leveraging media tools such as video content and crowdsourced visual critiques, the organization raises public awareness and shapes discourse around UN bias, because compelling narratives and accessible formats amplify criticism of international institutions and mobilize broader support for reform or disengagement.
- Reform Through Institutional Engagement and Accountabilitymethodology: international human rights reformBy engaging with UN mechanisms, tracking formal institutional actions, and producing expert research, the organization aims to reform international human rights governance from within, because credible, evidence-based participation increases influence over normative standards and promotes structural integrity.