What they call their work
What they do
-
Criminal Justice Policy Advocacy 2 activities
- Advancing criminal justice reform through policy development and collaborationInitiates and reviews criminal justice reform proposals, develops improvements for prosecutors and law enforcement, assesses emerging criminal justice topics, and collaborates with justice partners across local, state, national, and international levels.
- Conducting research on criminal justice initiatives and erroneous convictionsPartners with academics and researchers to study and develop initiatives aimed at improving the criminal justice system, including research into the causes of erroneous convictions.
-
-
Law Enforcement Professional Development 2 activities
- Developing and supporting best practices committees for prosecutorsProvides technical assistance, training, materials, expert advice, and research to support prosecutor best practices committees at the statewide, national, and international levels.
- Providing education to prosecutors and law enforcement on emerging criminal justice issuesDelivers education and training to prosecutors and law enforcement officials at local, national, and international levels on emerging issues and methods to improve the criminal justice system.
-
Who runs it
| Name | Title | Hours/wk | Compensation |
|---|---|---|---|
| KRISTINE HAMANN | EXECUTIVE DI | 40 | $118K |
- ALAN SANKIN — TREASURER
- DENISE O'DONNELL — DIRECTOR
- KATHERINE COBB — DIRECTOR
Who they work with
- Academics and Researchers Partner — Collaborates with academics and researchers to develop and study criminal justice improvement initiatives and examine causes of erroneous convictions.
How they approach the work
Named approaches extracted from this org’s sources. Where others share an approach, follow it to see the full set of orgs running it.
- Evidence-Based Prosecutorial Reformmethodology: evidence_based_reformBy collaborating with academic and research partners to generate data-driven insights, the organization develops and promotes reforms that address systemic flaws in prosecution, particularly to prevent erroneous convictions—because empirical analysis leads to more accurate and just outcomes.